|
Post by Jil on Oct 26, 2008 21:01:01 GMT -8
Hahaha. And I'm guessing you're in charge of what they become? Hahaha... I see we have some new words censored... I don't know... this could be fun.
And now once we figure out what everything means, translation is going to be a... ... uh... suck. =D Kidding. Fuck.
|
|
|
Post by milofultz on Oct 26, 2008 21:33:46 GMT -8
fag fag bitch bitch
|
|
|
Post by milofultz on Oct 26, 2008 21:34:05 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Jil on Oct 26, 2008 22:36:51 GMT -8
What the hell!? What were you trying to say? hahahaha
|
|
|
Post by Shayne the Kid on Oct 27, 2008 2:58:25 GMT -8
meat pole? oyster ditch? I like hatchet wound better lol
|
|
|
Post by Jil on Oct 27, 2008 7:29:47 GMT -8
Hahahahaha!
|
|
|
Post by milofultz on Oct 27, 2008 8:07:42 GMT -8
I wrote f.a.g. f.a.g. b.i.t.c.h. b.i.t.c.h.
and it came out:
silly f.a.g. b.i.t.c.h. b.i.t.c.h.
Look up thurr! ^
|
|
|
Post by Shayne the Kid on Oct 27, 2008 11:21:21 GMT -8
this is so stupid
|
|
|
Post by Jil on Oct 27, 2008 12:18:34 GMT -8
Hahaha Whatever! You guys are totally having fun with it!
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Oct 27, 2008 14:04:02 GMT -8
dude new band name THE LIBERAL ELITE lolzorz
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Oct 27, 2008 14:11:56 GMT -8
... ... that looks like the range I go shooting at.... ... Sad. And you people are ridiculous. Neither Obama or McCain will be our next president if we're all smart about it. RON PAUL! AMEN! PREACH IT! RON PAUL \bitches couldn't win if the country's best hopes rested on him \(bitches) All we can do is vote who we would rather be our president, not vote for who is likely to win. eff the 2 party system! (and our hopes do rest on him!) LOLZORZ ive never heard that before!!!! i can however assume what it means.
|
|
|
Post by Sean Sultan on Oct 27, 2008 17:55:20 GMT -8
Than what there are just fewer racists today? MSNBC Exclaimed surprise last week that North Carolina was actually a toss up state and that they were leaning toward Obama because of the economic problems. jees Milo, do a little research. Yeah I did that and it just ignores my modifications. using msnbc exclusively for news is like writing a research paper using wikipedia as your only source. turn on fox news sometime. i'm not saying i agree with it all the time, but you'll get a much different perspective. First...It was a joke. Second...Fox News (aka faux news aka fixed news aka fox newsless) is too busy sucking elephant cock to comment anything credible about the GOP or any of its members. On the rare occasions that they actually speak against the Republican Party it's a surprise but usually has to do with something they're pissed about. Unless it's not in which case it's credibly awesome. True, MSNBC is usually fairly liberal, however they're a lot less liberal than people give them credit for. The reason people believe MSNBC is so liberal is because they have openly oppose Bush for the past four or more years. However, one person a party or lean (left/right) does not make. MSNBC is by far more centralist than say Fox or CNN. ABC and CBS are generally a bit conservative but are still by far more central than Fox. Actually I have used Wikipedia as my main reference on research papers before and gotten good grades for them. Nothing professional mind you, but stll, in classes where the teacher actually knew what they were teaching. I know what your saying though. I do watch fox occasionally when I just want to see what their saying but rarely do I find anything that isn't either obscure or republican propaganda. I usually read the paper or see what is being said on line as well as watch MSNBC.
|
|
|
Post by Sean Sultan on Oct 27, 2008 18:08:40 GMT -8
All we can do is vote who we would rather be our president, not vote for who is likely to win. eff the 2 party system! (and our hopes do rest on him!) Look, vote for whomever you want. All I'm saying is that he didn't win the GOP nomination, which probably means more than 100million people had a good reason not to vote for him. I wouldn't vote for him now anyway because I don't agree with him about deregulation but that's probably why I vote (D). I'm not saying that I wouldn't vote for a republican president but he/she would have to give me a damn good reason to or there would have to be a democrat who absolutely disgusted me (like Lieberman *involuntary shudder*)
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Oct 27, 2008 19:56:19 GMT -8
he didnt win the GOP because his ideas are too far from the regular. he had such a great grass roots movement that the mainline GOP was afraid of him. i think thats a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by milofultz on Oct 27, 2008 21:57:43 GMT -8
using msnbc exclusively for news is like writing a research paper using wikipedia as your only source. turn on fox news sometime. i'm not saying i agree with it all the time, but you'll get a much different perspective. First...It was a joke. Second...Fox News (aka faux news aka fixed news aka fox newsless) is too busy sucking elephant cock to comment anything credible about the GOP or any of its members. On the rare occasions that they actually speak against the Republican Party it's a surprise but usually has to do with something they're pissed about. Unless it's not in which case it's credibly awesome. True, MSNBC is usually fairly liberal, however they're a lot less liberal than people give them credit for. The reason people believe MSNBC is so liberal is because they have openly oppose Bush for the past four or more years. However, one person a party or lean (left/right) does not make. MSNBC is by far more centralist than say Fox or CNN. ABC and CBS are generally a bit conservative but are still by far more central than Fox. I agree with Chris. Until you see both sides, you can't really know what's going on, or whatever close to news we can get. DON'T.
|
|