|
Post by perry on May 11, 2009 8:33:45 GMT -8
Don't fuck this one up with threats and bickering. Just write your damn reviews.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on May 11, 2009 9:19:46 GMT -8
Hahaha.
Man...I thought that that show was pretty damn fun.
Molly's Hollow played better than I have seen them play in the past. Dylan's vocals are improving greatly. Naked In Alaska is another band that has gotten a lot better since the first time I saw them. They are pretty energetic live. Brahmin just completely sucked. There's nothing more hideous than their sorry excuse for a breakdown
I jest I jest.
Brahmin played pretty fuckin' good. The new tunes were rad as hell.
Yeah...I think all the guitars, of every band, should have been louder. USE FULL STACKS! Haha...
|
|
|
Post by The Dreaded T on May 11, 2009 9:36:21 GMT -8
Indeed Mollys Hollow improved, musically. However once again, they were 40 minutes late AND had to use other bands equipment.
Naked In Alaska, I agree with Phil when he said that he felt cheated after finding out that they had covered 3 songs. I would like to see more of THEIR material and not some other bands that they had copied.
Brahmin finally got to show off their new songs and it seemed like everyone enjoyed them and got moving. Even my dad who doesnt even like deathcore. <3
|
|
|
Post by Amber on May 11, 2009 12:10:39 GMT -8
This is crappy.. I don't want to type everything all over again... But, I liked all the bands. Molly's Hollow was off their game a little, but overall, I liked all of them. Naked in Alaska was tighhht! Haha. And, Brahmin was sweet, as always.
|
|
|
Post by stephen0 on May 11, 2009 13:58:23 GMT -8
mollys hollow, i have seen better. and yes, the always late and equipment borrowing is sketchy. i like dylans vocals though.
naked in alaska got waaay better, and yeah covers are for noobs. they should put more effort into their own material.
brahmin was siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiick. way sick. good energy, solid shit. and one riff especially was super sick.. reminded me of another band...hmmmm.
|
|
|
Post by travis on May 11, 2009 16:21:02 GMT -8
There was a lot more unity at this show than any other Seriously awesome show There was a good turn out and there was a lot of people in the pit that have had previous issues that got along great Shit was good and no fights...that I am aware of...but lets leave that one alone
|
|
|
Post by Amber on May 11, 2009 16:58:48 GMT -8
Agreed. It was an awesome show. I really really enjoyed it.
|
|
|
Post by Sean Corkum on May 11, 2009 22:03:58 GMT -8
Hey hey. Covers aren't for n00bs.
So long as you announce the fact that you're playing a cover. Cuz then it's some fun shit.
But if half your set is covers . . . uhh. Well.
I unno. More originality. And more clarification of the coverage going on, diggs?
Hahahaha shit I wasn't even there. Why am I posting?
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on May 12, 2009 8:36:01 GMT -8
I agree with you...Sean...Corkum.
Covers are nice every once and awhile...but half a set? Eh...hmmm...let's leave the comments to ourselves. Ha...
|
|
|
Post by The Dreaded T on May 12, 2009 9:27:08 GMT -8
They didn't say they were covering. Only people who knew the songs could tell that they were covers.
I didn't know till Perry had told me.
|
|